<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revit 2009 - New Feature Sweep Blend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designreform.net/2008/04/28/revit-2009-sweep-blend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designreform.net/2008/04/28/revit-2009-sweep-blend/</link>
	<description>ReThinking Design</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David fano</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2008/04/28/revit-2009-sweep-blend/#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator>David fano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=190#comment-1781</guid>
		<description>de nada</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- wrapping ads -->
<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
de nada<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr3am</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2008/04/28/revit-2009-sweep-blend/#comment-1777</link>
		<dc:creator>dr3am</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=190#comment-1777</guid>
		<description>Gracias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- wrapping ads -->
<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Gracias<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2008/04/28/revit-2009-sweep-blend/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=190#comment-601</guid>
		<description>I have had the same problem.  I think the tool will get better as Revit becomes a stronger modeler</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- wrapping ads -->
<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I have had the same problem.  I think the tool will get better as Revit becomes a stronger modeler<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2008/04/28/revit-2009-sweep-blend/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=190#comment-518</guid>
		<description>Hey there =)

...the only problem, I've found, is that you have to use a continous line,spline or curve for it to work. 

You can't ,for example, fillet a corner, and use this as a path because the path then consists of more than one segment, which Revit complains about and won't accept as a valid path. 

Have you encountered the same problem?

Later</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- wrapping ads -->
<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Hey there =)</p>
<p>&#8230;the only problem, I&#8217;ve found, is that you have to use a continous line,spline or curve for it to work. </p>
<p>You can&#8217;t ,for example, fillet a corner, and use this as a path because the path then consists of more than one segment, which Revit complains about and won&#8217;t accept as a valid path. </p>
<p>Have you encountered the same problem?</p>
<p>Later<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
