http://designreform.net/2009/06/ifc-from-rhino-through-revit/ ReThinking Design Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:05:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 http://designreform.net/2009/06/ifc-from-rhino-through-revit/comment-page-1/#comment-12766 Martin Taurer Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:19:30 +0000 http://designreform.net/?p=1566#comment-12766 The wall in Revit will show Area and Volume as well as long as you put it in a schedule. The wall in Revit will show Area and Volume as well as long as you put it in a schedule.

]]> http://designreform.net/2009/06/ifc-from-rhino-through-revit/comment-page-1/#comment-10847 David Fano Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:26:58 +0000 http://designreform.net/?p=1566#comment-10847 That's a good point. I'll do a test That’s a good point. I’ll do a test

]]> http://designreform.net/2009/06/ifc-from-rhino-through-revit/comment-page-1/#comment-10817 NickPisca Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:32:19 +0000 http://designreform.net/?p=1566#comment-10817 I bet your bottom area discrepancy comes from the meshing of the IFC translation. IFC doesn't translate nurbs yet. So the Nurbs bottom surface in Rhino would be slightly larger than the translated mesh IFC surface. It would be cool to use the Revit .net API's to automate this process, since you can access Rhino with GetObject. But I doubt Revit's libraries are comprehensive enough. I bet your bottom area discrepancy comes from the meshing of the IFC translation. IFC doesn’t translate nurbs yet. So the Nurbs bottom surface in Rhino would be slightly larger than the translated mesh IFC surface.
It would be cool to use the Revit .net API’s to automate this process, since you can access Rhino with GetObject. But I doubt Revit’s libraries are comprehensive enough.

]]>