<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Webinars on DesignReForm?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/</link>
	<description>ReThinking Design</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JUSTIN BO</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/comment-page-1/#comment-12658</link>
		<dc:creator>JUSTIN BO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=1796#comment-12658</guid>
		<description>Revit and how about some revit - max combo's</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Revit and how about some revit - max combo&#8217;s<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ersin</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/comment-page-1/#comment-12607</link>
		<dc:creator>ersin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=1796#comment-12607</guid>
		<description>revit, max, inventor, vectorworks and allplan!..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->revit, max, inventor, vectorworks and allplan!..<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rene c neira</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/comment-page-1/#comment-12605</link>
		<dc:creator>rene c neira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=1796#comment-12605</guid>
		<description>1) AUTOCAD  REVIT  MAX &amp; IMPRESSION

2) MASSING ON REVIT &amp; MODELING AN LIGHTING ON MAX

3) 30 TO 45 MIN.

YES! BUT AFTER THE CAST</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->1) AUTOCAD  REVIT  MAX &amp; IMPRESSION</p>
<p>2) MASSING ON REVIT &amp; MODELING AN LIGHTING ON MAX</p>
<p>3) 30 TO 45 MIN.</p>
<p>YES! BUT AFTER THE CAST<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saurabh chhabra</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/comment-page-1/#comment-12527</link>
		<dc:creator>saurabh chhabra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=1796#comment-12527</guid>
		<description>hey,
guys the first question is totally irrelevant as the knowledge in anything and everthing will do there only one issue that i felt was the broadcasts which will be made should be uploaded on net not live interactions as there could will be issue of time zones involved and i would prefer that you upload a broadcast and make a discussion area where we can discuss that broadcasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->hey,<br />
guys the first question is totally irrelevant as the knowledge in anything and everthing will do there only one issue that i felt was the broadcasts which will be made should be uploaded on net not live interactions as there could will be issue of time zones involved and i would prefer that you upload a broadcast and make a discussion area where we can discuss that broadcasts.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mehmet Polat Diker</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/comment-page-1/#comment-11997</link>
		<dc:creator>Mehmet Polat Diker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=1796#comment-11997</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the work you're doing here.

1)Revit.
2) Real world/project situations. Building an eyecandy is good, but integrating it in a real project and dealing with the problems is better.
3) 60 min. seems fine
4) Maybe after the cast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I appreciate the work you&#8217;re doing here.</p>
<p>1)Revit.<br />
2) Real world/project situations. Building an eyecandy is good, but integrating it in a real project and dealing with the problems is better.<br />
3) 60 min. seems fine<br />
4) Maybe after the cast.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jagou1</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/comment-page-1/#comment-11954</link>
		<dc:creator>jagou1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=1796#comment-11954</guid>
		<description>grasshopper
rhino
max

great idea as its hard to find real time tutorials for grasshopper. would be a great help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->grasshopper<br />
rhino<br />
max</p>
<p>great idea as its hard to find real time tutorials for grasshopper. would be a great help<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tilite</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/comment-page-1/#comment-11710</link>
		<dc:creator>tilite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=1796#comment-11710</guid>
		<description>[ext]

In point 1. - My interest would extend to all applications as long as I am receiving some type of conceptual feedback eg Revit - Solar radiation producing analytical results of form.

People in this contemporary digital design environment need to start understand its not just about a sexy aesthetic. Aesthetics are only skin deep! If you could address that you would be doing a great thing for the digital design community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->[ext]</p>
<p>In point 1. - My interest would extend to all applications as long as I am receiving some type of conceptual feedback eg Revit - Solar radiation producing analytical results of form.</p>
<p>People in this contemporary digital design environment need to start understand its not just about a sexy aesthetic. Aesthetics are only skin deep! If you could address that you would be doing a great thing for the digital design community.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tilite</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/comment-page-1/#comment-11709</link>
		<dc:creator>tilite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=1796#comment-11709</guid>
		<description>1.   Maya &#124; Max &#124; Rhino &#124; Grasshopper
2.   Advanced modeling techniques for conceptual design producing both qualitative and quantitative results.
3.   60mins or so
4.   Probably not, it is usually a waste of time and a failure. I have seen many of these things and 2 people with intelligent and comedic dialog work best. Any more and its to busy and nothing gets done/learnt, any less and its to 'lonely'. I would suggest you bring the audience in with a chat room. Have your producer monitor it for a common theme popping up. Address that if you feel its relevant but don't just take every question that arises.

Happy to respond further by email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->1.   Maya | Max | Rhino | Grasshopper<br />
2.   Advanced modeling techniques for conceptual design producing both qualitative and quantitative results.<br />
3.   60mins or so<br />
4.   Probably not, it is usually a waste of time and a failure. I have seen many of these things and 2 people with intelligent and comedic dialog work best. Any more and its to busy and nothing gets done/learnt, any less and its to &#8216;lonely&#8217;. I would suggest you bring the audience in with a chat room. Have your producer monitor it for a common theme popping up. Address that if you feel its relevant but don&#8217;t just take every question that arises.</p>
<p>Happy to respond further by email.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikoaj</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/comment-page-1/#comment-11687</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikoaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=1796#comment-11687</guid>
		<description>1) Maya! Cienema 4D -&gt;Archicad !
2) From 3d form finding to 2d drawings workflow 
3) 60min/7
4) YES!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->1) Maya! Cienema 4D -&gt;Archicad !<br />
2) From 3d form finding to 2d drawings workflow<br />
3) 60min/7<br />
4) YES!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MArco</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/comment-page-1/#comment-11566</link>
		<dc:creator>MArco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=1796#comment-11566</guid>
		<description>Super idea

1.Different in a same webinars, more than one in a time
2.processing and interactions between different programs, departing from a common topic -such as IFC use or very small design+scheduling "experiments" or whatever-
3.less than 1h
4.most important part: Q&amp;A should be really fit into the webinar, maybe less demostration and more Q&amp;A could be a good move (different from tutorials)

As superb tutorials already are, most important is to avoid that webinars become such-a-autodesk(R)-demonstration.
I would find interesting the application on real case studies -parametric modeling and analysis of a to-desing tower, for intance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Super idea</p>
<p>1.Different in a same webinars, more than one in a time<br />
2.processing and interactions between different programs, departing from a common topic -such as IFC use or very small design+scheduling &#8220;experiments&#8221; or whatever-<br />
3.less than 1h<br />
4.most important part: Q&amp;A should be really fit into the webinar, maybe less demostration and more Q&amp;A could be a good move (different from tutorials)</p>
<p>As superb tutorials already are, most important is to avoid that webinars become such-a-autodesk(R)-demonstration.<br />
I would find interesting the application on real case studies -parametric modeling and analysis of a to-desing tower, for intance<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shkodran shala</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/comment-page-1/#comment-11514</link>
		<dc:creator>Shkodran shala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=1796#comment-11514</guid>
		<description>Cool Idea David,thnx for it!
1. 3Ds Max,
2. Animations/Modelim
3. 30-45 min
4. Yes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Cool Idea David,thnx for it!<br />
1. 3Ds Max,<br />
2. Animations/Modelim<br />
3. 30-45 min<br />
4. Yes<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fabio</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/comment-page-1/#comment-11502</link>
		<dc:creator>fabio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=1796#comment-11502</guid>
		<description>1_I would like to see demonstration for Rhino and Cinema 4D
2_I would like to see topics about parametric modeling
3_I think the broadcast would be long about 3 minutes. If longer (I hope), it would be downloadable (I hope too)
4_I think is not stectly necessary to interact in webinaries.

Thanks for your work, it's preciuos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->1_I would like to see demonstration for Rhino and Cinema 4D<br />
2_I would like to see topics about parametric modeling<br />
3_I think the broadcast would be long about 3 minutes. If longer (I hope), it would be downloadable (I hope too)<br />
4_I think is not stectly necessary to interact in webinaries.</p>
<p>Thanks for your work, it&#8217;s preciuos<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/comment-page-1/#comment-11479</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=1796#comment-11479</guid>
		<description>Could be good, but what would the benefit of these be over the standard recorded tutorials that you can watch as many times as you like?

There is also the issue of people in different time zones wanting to view at the same time...

I love this site and what you guys are doing, but I would personally just rather see loads more tutorials!

Websites like this are the only source of training a lot of us have for certain programs, and we have to find any time we can to watch and learn from the pro's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Could be good, but what would the benefit of these be over the standard recorded tutorials that you can watch as many times as you like?</p>
<p>There is also the issue of people in different time zones wanting to view at the same time&#8230;</p>
<p>I love this site and what you guys are doing, but I would personally just rather see loads more tutorials!</p>
<p>Websites like this are the only source of training a lot of us have for certain programs, and we have to find any time we can to watch and learn from the pro&#8217;s.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anu</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/comment-page-1/#comment-11468</link>
		<dc:creator>anu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=1796#comment-11468</guid>
		<description>Thanks in advance!
Its gr8 for newbies like me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Thanks in advance!<br />
Its gr8 for newbies like me.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://designreform.net/2009/07/webinars-on-designreform/comment-page-1/#comment-11464</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreform.net/?p=1796#comment-11464</guid>
		<description>Absolutely!!

1-Processing (if you have the capability), Grasshopper, Ecotect, Rhino, revit
2-Performance based design using data in the generation of form. 
3- As long as you guys can make them.
4- Yes

Any techniques that highlight the process of moving from conceptual modeling into BIM for documentation.  The AD issue "Closing the Gap" addressed some very relevant topics in this area and it would be nice to get some insight into the workflows.

Thanks for pushing the site to a new level.  I look forward to what's to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Absolutely!!</p>
<p>1-Processing (if you have the capability), Grasshopper, Ecotect, Rhino, revit<br />
2-Performance based design using data in the generation of form.<br />
3- As long as you guys can make them.<br />
4- Yes</p>
<p>Any techniques that highlight the process of moving from conceptual modeling into BIM for documentation.  The AD issue &#8220;Closing the Gap&#8221; addressed some very relevant topics in this area and it would be nice to get some insight into the workflows.</p>
<p>Thanks for pushing the site to a new level.  I look forward to what&#8217;s to come.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
